Impact of surgical variables on residual glandular tissue in risk-reducing mastectomies: Results of a retrospective monocentric study from a center of the German consortium for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: Residual glandular tissue (RGT) after risk reducing mastectomy (RRME) is associated with a risk of developing breast cancer for women with a familial predisposition. We aim to examine various surgery-related variables to make risk more easily assessable and to aid in decision-making. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pre- and postoperative breast MRI scans from 2006 to 2021 of patients with proven pathogenic mutation were included. The postoperative remaining skin flap was recorded using distance measurements at 8 equally distributed clockwise points and retromamillary. Each breast was volumetrized, as well as existing RGT. Patient-related covariates were further recorded and their influence on RGT was investigated uni- and multivariately. RESULTS: 81 patients (49 with BRCA1, 24 with BRCA2, 9 with other mutations), who were on average 39 years old, had 117 breasts analyzed. The mean follow-up was 71 months. In multivariate analysis, the independent variable skin flap thickness had a positive effect (p ≤ 0.01), while surgeon experience negatively affected RGT (p ≤ 0.05). The incision type was found to impact RGT as well, with nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with inframammary fold incision leading to more RGT (p ≤ 0.01 - p ≤ 0.05), and skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with an inverted T incision leading to less (p ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSION: Different surgical variables have an impact on postoperative RGT, which is an important tool to quantify the risk of developing breast cancer after RRME. In order to effectively consider these variables in future preoperative/intraoperative management, they must be carefully taken into account.

Factors Influencing Residual Glandular Breast Tissue after Risk-Reducing Mastectomy in Genetically Predisposed Individuals Detected by MRI Mammography.

PURPOSE: This study seeks to evaluate MR imaging morphological factors and other covariates that influence the presence of residual glandular tissue after risk-reducing mastectomy in patients with a familial predisposition. METHODS: We analyzed women of a high-risk collective with pathogenic mutation (BRCA1 (n = 49), BRCA2 (n = 24), or further mutation (n = 9)). A total of 117 breasts were analyzed, 63 left and 54 right, from a cohort of 81 patients, who were on average 40 years old. The mean follow-up was 63 months (range 12-180 months, SD = 39.67). Retrospective analysis of MR imaging data from 2006-2022 of patients of a high-risk collective (all carriers of a pathogenic mutation) with contralateral (RRCM) or bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy (RRBM) was performed. In the image data the remaining skin flap thickness by distance measurements at eight equally distributed, clockwise points and the retromamillary area, as well as by volumetry of each breast, was elected. Residual glandular tissue was also volumetrized. In addition, patient-related covariates were recorded and their influence on postoperative residual glandular tissue and skin flap thickness was analyzed by uni- and multivariate regressions. RESULTS: A significant association with postoperative residual glandular tissue was shown in multivariate analysis for the independent variables breast density, skin flap mean, and surgical method (all p-values < 0.01). A negatively significant association could be seen for the variables preoperative breast volume (p-values < 0.01) and surgeon experience (most p-values < 0.05-<0.1). CONCLUSION: Postoperative residual glandular tissue is an important tool for quantifying the risk of developing breast cancer after risk-reducing mastectomy. Different effects on residual glandular tissue were shown for the independent variables breast density, skin flap, surgical method, preoperative breast volume, and surgeon experience, so these should be considered in future surgical procedures preoperatively as well as postoperatively. Breast MRI has proven to be a suitable method to analyze the skin flap as well as the RGT.

Predictive Factors of Long-Term Survival after Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in High-Risk Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (naRT) in addition to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (naCT) has been used for locally advanced, inoperable breast cancer or to allow breast conserving surgery (BCS). Retrospective analyses suggest that naRT + naCT might result in an improvement in pathological complete response (pCR rate and disease-free survival). pCR is a surrogate parameter for improved event-free and overall survival (OS) and allows for the adaption of the post-neoadjuvant therapy regimens. However, it is not clear whether pCR achieved with the addition of naRT has the same prognostic value. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective re-analysis of 356 patients (cT1-cT4/cN0-N+) treated with naRT and naCT with a long-term follow-up. Patients underwent naRT on the breast and regional lymph nodes combined with a boost to the primary tumor. Chemotherapy with different agents was given either sequentially or concomitantly to naRT. We used the Cox proportional hazard regression model to estimate the effect of pCR in our cohort in different subgroups as well as chemotherapy protocols. Clinical response markers correlating with OS were also analyzed. RESULTS: For patients with median follow-ups of 20 years, 10 years, 15 years, 20 years, and 25 years, OS rates were 69.7%, 60.6%, 53.1%, and 45.1%, respectively. pCR was achieved in 31.1% of patients and associated with a significant improvement in OS (HR = 0.58; CI-95%: 0.41-0.80; p = 0.001). The prognostic impact of pCR was evident across breast cancer subtypes and chemotherapy regimens. Multivariate analysis showed that age, clinical tumor and nodal stage, chemotherapy, and pCR were prognostic for OS. CONCLUSION: NaCT and naRT prior to surgical resection achieve good long-term survival in high-risk breast cancer. pCR after naRT maintains its prognostic value in breast cancer subtypes and across different subgroups. pCR driven by naRT and naCT independently influences long-term survival.

Early Outcome, Cosmetic Result and Tolerability of an IOERT-Boost Prior to Adjuvant Whole-Breast Irradiation.

Background/Aims: Due to its favorable dose distribution and targeting of the region at highest risk of recurrence due to direct visualization of tumor bed, intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) is used as part of a breast-conserving treatment approach. The aim of this study was to analyze tumor control and survival, as well as the toxicity profile, and cosmetic outcomes in patients irradiated with an IOERT boost for breast cancer. Materials and Methods: 139 Patients treated at our institution between January 2010 and January 2015 with a single boost dose of 10 Gy to the tumor bed during breast-conserving surgery followed by whole-breast irradiation were retrospectively analyzed. Results: 139 patients were included in this analysis. The median age was 54 years (range 28−83 years). The preferred surgical strategy was segmental resection with sentinel lymphonodectomy (66.5%) or axillary dissection (23.1%). Regarding adjuvant radiotherapy, the vast majority received 5 × 1.8 Gy to 50.4 Gy. At a median follow-up of 33.6 months, recurrence-free and overall survival were 95.5% and 94.9%, respectively. No patient developed an in-field recurrence. Seven patients (5.0%) died during the follow-up period, including two patients due to disease recurrence (non-in-field). High-grade (CTCAE > 2) perioperative adverse events attributable to IOERT included wound healing disorder (N = 1) and hematoma (N = 1). High-grade late adverse events (LENT-SOMA grade III) were reported only in one patient with fat necrosis. Low-grade late adverse events (LENT-SOMA grade I-II) included pain (18.0%), edema (10.5%), fibrosis (21%), telangiectasia (4.5%) and pigmentation change (23.0%). The mean breast retraction assessment score was 1.66 (0−6). Both patients and specialists rated the cosmetic result "excellent/good" in 84.8% and 87.9%, respectively. Conclusion: Our study reports favorable data on the cosmetic outcome as well as the acute and early long-term tolerability for patients treated with an IOERT boost. Our oncologic control rates are comparable to the previous literature. However, prospective investigations on the role of IOERT in comparison to other boost procedures would be desirable.

Post-Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategies in Breast Cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy enables close monitoring of tumor response in patients with breast cancer. Being able to assess tumor response during treatment provides an opportunity to evaluate new therapeutic strategies. Thus, for triple-negative breast tumors, it was demonstrated that additional immunotherapy could improve prognosis compared with chemotherapy alone. Furthermore, adjuvant therapy can be escalated or de-escalated correspondingly. The CREATE-X trial randomly assigned HER2-negative patients with residual tumor after neoadjuvant therapy to either observation or capecitabine. In HER2-negative patients with positive BRCA testing, the OlympiA study randomly assigned patients to either observation or olaparib. HER2-positive patients without pathologic remission were randomly assigned to trastuzumab or trastuzumab-emtansine within the KATHERINE study. These studies were all able to show an improvement in oncologic outcome associated with the escalation of therapy in patients presenting with residual tumor after neoadjuvant treatment. On the other hand, this individualization of therapy may also offer the possibility to de-escalate treatment, and thereby reduce morbidity. Among WSG-ADAPT HER2+/HR-, HER2-positive patients achieved comparable results without chemotherapy after complete remission following neoadjuvant treatment. In summary, the concept of post-neoadjuvant therapy constitutes a great opportunity for individualized cancer treatment, potentially improving outcome. In this review, the most important trials of post-neoadjuvant therapy are compiled and discussed.

The benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery in older patients with low risk breast cancer- a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): It is currently unclear whether patients with low risk breast cancer receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy need adjuvant radiation therapy after breast conserving surgery. The data of randomized trials are available. MATERIALS/METHODS: In a database search 5 randomized trials including in total 3766 mostly elderly patients with early stage breast cancer treated either with adjuvant endocrine therapy or with endocrine therapy and additional whole breast radiation after breast conserving surgery were identified. Published hazard ratios for time to local recurrence were the basis of our meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of the effect sizes on local recurrence was performed using a random effects model based on parameter estimates of log hazard ratios in Cox models and their standard errors. Furthermore, overall survival was examined. RESULTS: Adjuvant hormone therapy alone in mostly older patients with low risk breast cancer resulted in significantly shorter time to local relapse compared to radiation therapy combined with hormone therapy (Hazard Ratio: 6.8, 95% CI: 4.23-10.93, p < 0.0001) . There was no significant difference for overall survival. CONCLUSION: Additional radiation therapy to hormone therapy did improve local relapse in breast cancer patients but did not show significant impact on overall survival.

Breast reconstruction after neoadjuvant radio chemotherapy: review and personal technique IDEAL concept REV-EJMR-D-15-00268.

Neoadjuvant radio chemotherapy and immediate reconstruction for breast cancer are still under debate. But there are recent abstracts and articles which show that neoadjuvant radio chemotherapy is feasible and could improve the clinical outcome of breast cancer patients. The aim of this review is to present the authors' techniques and approaches with regard to neoadjuvant radiation of breast cancer patients. It seems that the concept of immediate implant delayed autologous breast reconstruction could be a safe procedure that is at least equivalent to primary autologous reconstruction.

Conservative mastectomies and Immediate-DElayed AutoLogous (IDEAL) breast reconstruction: the DIEP flap.

BACKGROUND: With the development of conservative mastectomies, there are an increasing number of women seeking immediate implant based and autologous breast reconstruction. Despite the oncologic safety of the procedures, the focus will be on the timing of reconstruction. METHODS: Our plastic surgery unit is focused primarily on autologous breast reconstruction and is part of an interdisciplinary breast center. We offer immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) with autologous tissue for patients with positive BRCA 1 and 2, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), invasive cancer without margin problems to the skin, as well as to correct poor oncologic and aesthetic breast conserving therapy (BCT) outcomes. In the majority of cases we prefer an Immediate-DElayed AutoLogous (IDEAL) breast reconstruction concept with a two-stage procedure. RESULTS: Over the last 10 years we performed more than 1,600 breast reconstructions with free flaps, performing the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap as our first choice for autologous tissue. We recommend IDEAL breast reconstruction, however approximately 15% of our cases are immediate one stage conservative mastectomies and breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap. CONCLUSIONS: For immediate reconstruction, the aesthetic outcome should not take precedence over oncologic considerations. Immediate one-stage, breast reconstruction with autologous tissue can be offered to the suitable patients which is most likely a healthy women with a small-to-medium sized non ptotic breast receiving a conservative mastectomy. In all other cases, we recommend an IDEAL breast reconstruction approach in order to achieve a final result that is both satisfyingly pleasing and oncologically safe.

Adjuvant radiation therapy of regional lymph nodes in breast cancer - a meta-analysis of randomized trials- an update.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) of regional lymph nodes (LN) in early breast cancer is still a matter of debate. RT increases the Overall survival (OS) rate of breast cancer patients after breast conserving surgery and after mastectomy in patients with involved LN. The contribution of RT to regional LN to this improvement was poorly identified. Recently, the results of three large randomized trials addressing this question were published as full papers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Published data of the MA.20 (n = 1832), the EORTC22922-10925 (EORTC) (n = 4004) trial and the French trial (n = 1334) were the foundation of this meta-analysis. Major eligibility criteria were positive i) axillary LN (all trials), ii) LN negative disease with high risk for recurrence (MA.20), and iii) medial/central tumor location (French, EORTC). The MA.20 and the EORTC trial analyzed the effect of additional regional RT to the internal mammary (IM) LN and medial supraclavicular (MS) LN, whereas in the French trial all patients received RT to the MS-LN and solely RT to the IM-LN was randomized. Primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS). RESULTS: Regional RT of MS-LN and IM-LN (MA.20 and EORTC) resulted in a significant improvement of OS [Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.88 (95 % CL 0.78 - 0.99)]. Adding results of the French trial and using a random effects model to respect the different design of the French trial, the effect on OS of regional RT remained significant [HR 0.90 (95 % CL 0.82 - 0.99)]. The absolute benefits in OS were 1 % in the MA.20 trial at 10 years, 1.6 % in the EORTC trial at 10 years, and 3.3 % in the French trial at 10 years (not significant in single trials). Regional RT of MS-LN and IM-LN (MA.20 and EORTC) yielded to a significant improvement of DFS [HR 0.86 (95 % CL 0.78 - 0.95)] and DMFS [HR 0.84 (95 % CL 0.75 - 0.94)]. CONCLUSION: Additional regional RT to the internal mammary and medial supraclavicular LN statistically significantly improved DFS, DMFS, and OS in stage I-III breast cancer.

Role of Breast Surgery in BRCA Mutation Carriers.

BRCA mutation carriers have a life-long breast cancer risk between 55 and 85% and a high risk of developing breast cancer at a very young age, depending on the type of mutation. The risk of developing contralateral breast cancer after a first breast cancer is elevated up to 65%, especially in case of BRCA1 mutation and young age at the first breast cancer. Since bilateral prophylactic mastectomy is associated with a risk reduction of 90-95% of developing primary or contralateral breast cancer, this option is a key point within the counseling process for patient information and shared decision-making of mutation carriers. Although the local control after breast-conserving therapy in mutation carriers seems to be comparable to that of sporadic breast cancer patients, individual patient information and counseling should include all alternative procedures of oncologically adequate mastectomy techniques and immediate reconstruction. Excellent cosmetic results, high levels of life quality, and good patient acceptance can be achieved with the recent developments in reconstructive surgery of the breast.

[Hemangiosarcoma after breast-conserving therapy of breast cancer: report of four cases with molecular genetic diagnosis and literature review]. / Hämangiosarkom nach brusterhaltender Therapie beim Mammakarzinom: vier Fallbeispiele mit molekulargenetischer Diagnostik und Literaturübersicht.

BACKGROUND: Hemangiosarcomas of the breast represent a rare disease of the breast mainly occurring as secondary neoplasias with a latency of 5-10 years after primary treatment of breast cancer and are associated with an unfavourable prognosis. Radiation therapy, which is integrated within the concept of breast conserving therapy ranks as the main risk factor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this report we describe the clinical course of 4 patients including their molecular genetic pattern and give a summary of the actual literature. RESULTS: Hemangiosarcomas occur as a secondary neoplasm with a latency of 5-10 years after primary treatment of breast cancer and have an unfavorable prognosis. A genetic predisposition is assumed, but we could not find a significant role of tumor suppressor genes BRCA1, BRCA2 or p53 in our patients. CONCLUSION: Due to limited data available for these tumors, recommendations for therapy include radical tumor resection achieving wide free margins and inconsistent regimens of chemo- and/or immunetherapy modalities. In the majority these are based on systemic therapy regimens for other cutaneous sarcomas, such as Kaposi's sarcoma. Efforts should be taken for a nation-wide systematic registration of all cases of post-irradiation hemangiosarcomas.

Evaluation of mathematical models for breast cancer risk assessment in routine clinical use.

Chemoprevention, prophylactic surgery, and intensified screening can be offered to patients with an increased lifetime risk, p(life), for breast cancer. Estimation of p(life) includes BRCA analysis and risk estimation based on individual risk factors and family history. MENDEL and BRCAPRO are models that estimate the probability of BRCA1/2-mutations, p(mut), and p(life). In this study, the models are compared with Ford and Claus penetrance/frequency functions. The results were compared with the Tyrer-Cuzick model. Genetic analysis of 111 breast cancer-affected patients from 103 kindreds with a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer (German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer) was carried out by sequencing BRCA1 and BRCA2. p(life) and p(mut) were calculated with MENDEL, BRCAPRO(Claus), BRCAPRO(Ford), as well as the Tyrer-Cuzick model. The accuracy of p(mut) was analyzed by receiver operating characteristics, and p(life) of each model was compared. The strongest correlation of p(life) was shown by BRCAPRO(Ford)/MENDEL, at r=0.69; no correlation was shown by BRCAPRO(Claus)/MENDEL, at r=0.018. The Tyrer-Cuzick model had the strongest correlations with MENDEL and BRCAPRO(Ford). For MENDEL and BRCAPRO, low correlation or p(mut)-prediction was improved by excluding kindreds with ovarian cancer. p(mut) showed the best accuracy for BRCAPRO(Ford) and MENDEL. BRCAPRO and MENDEL are useful tools for calculating p(mut). They can provide support in decision-making for or against genetic analysis. Estimations of p(life) and p(mut) based on a mathematical model should use algorithms and penetrance/frequency data appropriate to the population counseled. Reproductive/hormonal data, should be incorporated as Tyrer-Cuzick does.

[Prophylactic mastectomy in women at high risk for breast and ovarian cancer: qualitative analysis of the decision making process and long-term satisfaction of two women carrying a BRCA1-mutation]. / Prophylaktische Chirurgie bei Brust- und Eierstockkrebsrisiko: qualitative Analyse des Entscheidungsprozesses und der Langzeit-zufriedenheit zweier BRCA1-Mutationsträgerinnen.

PURPOSE: Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy are currently the most effective prevention options for female carriers of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene. However, especially the mastectomy procedure is very invasive and is chosen rarely among high risk women in Germany. Little is known about how women cope with this surgery and their long-term satisfaction. METHODS: Face-to-face interviews were conducted with two BRCA1 mutation carriers, who had undergone prophylactic mastectomy in their twenties 9 and 16 years ago. The process of decision making and long-term satisfaction were analysed using Mayring's qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Both high risk women had a significant family history of breast and ovarian cancer. They were repeatedly confronted with uncontrollable courses of disease in their relatives who died of breast cancer between the age of 20 and 30 and left small children behind. Although both women experienced different decision making and peri- and post-operative complications, both were satisfied with the decision for prophylactic surgery and showed no regret. DISCUSSION: Deciding to obtain genetic testing pushed women towards further decision making concerning prophylactic surgery in case they carry a mutation. Information about carrier status reduced uncertainty even if the result was adverse. Both high risk women experienced a decrease in cancer related anxiety which may have heightened tolerance for quality of life related impairments. Implications for counseling are described.

Prediction of BRCA1 status in patients with breast cancer using estrogen receptor and basal phenotype.

PURPOSE: To investigate the proportion of breast cancers arising in patients with germ line BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations expressing basal markers and developing predictive tests for identification of high-risk patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Histopathologic material from 182 tumors in BRCA1 mutation carriers, 63 BRCA2 carriers, and 109 controls, collected as part of the international Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium were immunohistochemically stained for CK14, CK5/6, CK17, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and osteonectin. RESULTS: All five basal markers were commoner in BRCA1 tumors than in control tumors (CK14: 61% versus 12%; CK5/6: 58% versus 7%; CK17: 53% versus 10%; osteonectin: 43% versus 19%; EGFR: 67% versus 21%; P < 0.0001 in each case). In a multivariate analysis, CK14, CK5/6, and estrogen receptor (ER) remained significant predictors of BRCA1 carrier status. In contrast, the frequency of basal markers in BRCA2 tumors did not differ significant from controls. CONCLUSION: The use of cytokeratin staining in combination with ER and morphology provides a more accurate predictor of BRCA1 mutation status than previously available, that may be useful in selecting patients for BRCA1 mutation testing. The high percentage of BRCA1 cases positive for EGFR suggests that specific anti-tyrosine kinase therapy may be of potential benefit in these patients.